Texas State University Logo
Dissertation Defenses
JC Kellam 280
601 University Drive
San Marcos, TX 78666-4684
Ph: (512) 245-2581
Fax: (512) 245-8365

Join the Conversation

adjust type sizemake font smallermake font largerreset font size


Congratulations to the winners of the First 3MT® Competition at Texas State University.  The competition was held at Texas State on Monday, March 31, 2014.


The winners shown here with Dr. Golato, Dean of the Graduate College, are (L-R) William Barry, Adam Mathews, and Kanika Verma.

You can download the 3MT Competition program here

First Place Winner – William Barry. Mr. Barry is a doctoral student in Developmental Education. The title of his presentation was “Writing and technology: The effects of experimental instruction in first-year college courses”. The first place award was $500.
Runner-up - Adam Mathews 
Runner-up - Adam Mathews.  Mr. Mathews is working on his doctoral degree in Geographic Information Science.  The title of his presentation was “Vineyard surveillance: Using drone technology to aid crop management”.  This award was $350.
People’s Choice – Kanika Verma 
People’s Choice – Kanika Verma.  Ms Verma is a doctoral student in Geographic Education.  The title of her presentation was “Geospatial thinking of undergraduate students in the U.S.”.  The People’s Choice award was $250.

What is 3MT®?
Three Minute Thesis (3MT®) is a research communication competition developed by The University of Queensland (UQ). Doctoral students have three minutes to present a compelling oration on their research and its significance. 3MT® is not an exercise in trivializing or ‘dumbing-down’ research, but challenges students to consolidate their ideas and research discoveries so they can be presented concisely to a non-specialist audience.

The first 3MT® was held at UQ in 2008 with 160 students competing. Enthusiasm for the 3MT® concept grew and it has now been adopted by numerous universities in Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, the United Kingdom, Canada, Hong Kong, and the United States. The Texas State University Graduate College is excited about providing our students the opportunity to participate in the first annual 3MT® Competition held at our university.

Why is it called the three minute thesis?
The research product of doctoral students in Australia is referred to as a thesis. In the United States we call the document a dissertation. The concept applies equally to doctoral research regardless of what the final document is called. Imagine hearing an 80,000 word dissertation explained in less than 180 seconds? 3MT® contestants must do just that by condensing their research into a brief, engaging presentation for a non-specialist audience, using a single presentation slide.

Why compete?
The 3MT® Competition helps doctoral students develop academic, presentation, and research communication skills and supports the development of research students' capacity to effectively explain their research in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience. Accept the challenge to distill your dissertation research into a three minute presentation that is understandable to individuals outside of your field and participate in the 2014 Texas State University 3MT® Competition.

The Texas State University 3MT® Competition
Graduate students currently enrolled in a Texas State University research doctoral program are eligible to compete. Students in Master’s and professional graduate programs are not eligible.

Presentation Rules

  • A single static PowerPoint slide is permitted (no slide transitions, animations or 'movement' of any description, the slide is to be presented from the beginning of the oration).
  • No additional electronic media (e.g. sound and video files) are permitted.
  • No additional props (e.g. costumes, musical instruments, laboratory equipment) are permitted.
  • Laser pointers are not considered props and are allowed.
  • Presentations are limited to 3 minutes maximum and competitors exceeding 3 minutes are disqualified.
  • Presentations are to be spoken word (e.g. no poems, raps or songs).
  • Presentations are to commence from the platform.
  • Presentations are considered to have commenced when a presenter starts their presentation through movement or speech.
  • The decision of the adjudicating panel is final.

Judging Criteria
At every level of the competition each competitor will be assessed on the three judging criteria listed below.   Please note that each criterion is equally weighted and has an emphasis on audience.
1. Comprehension:

  • Did the presentation help the audience understand the research?
  • Did the presenter clearly outline the nature and aims of research?
  • Do you know what is significant about this research?
  • Did the presentation follow a logical sequence?

2. Engagement:

  • Did the oration make the audience want to know more?
  • Was the presenter careful not to trivialize or dumb down their research?
  • Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their work?
  • Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience's attention?
  • Would I like to know more about the speaker's research?

3. Communication:

  • Was the research topic and its significance communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
  • Did the speaker use sufficient eye contact and vocal range; maintain a steady pace, and a confident stance?
  • Did the speaker avoid scientific jargon, explain terminology that needed to be used, and provide adequate background information to illustrate points?
  • Did the presenter spend the right amount of time on each element of their presentation – or did they elaborate for too long or were rushed?
  • Did the PowerPoint slide enhance, rather than detract from their presentation – was it clear, legible, and concise?

How the Competition Works
There are several levels of competition including:
Program Heat
Each doctoral program will hold a Program Heat.  There is no limit to the number of doctoral students competing at this level.  The Program Heat judging panel will select the First Place Winner and Runner-up.  The audience will vote to select the People’s Choice winner.  These three student winners will advance to the next level of the competition.  Program Heats were held in February, 2014.

University Final Competition
Each program may send up to two winners from the Discipline Competition to compete in the University Final Competition.  The University Final judging panel will select the First Place Winner and Runner-up. The audience will vote to select the People’s Choice winner.  The University Final Competition was held March 31, 2014.